[infinispan-dev] Jenkins migration

Radim Vansa rvansa at redhat.com
Mon Apr 24 03:49:51 EDT 2017


I've heard that the default UI in Jenkins was the reason why we went 
with TC, and Blue Ocean was supposed to be the cure. Why was the default 
UI dismissed in the first place?

R.

On 04/23/2017 07:14 PM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
> I also do not see much value in the current state of Blue Ocean. 
> Better stick with the default ui.
>
> On 04/21/2017 06:11 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> Looks like the invalid "control characters from U+0000 through 
>> U+001F" are the  ANSI escape codes used by WildFly to color output. 
>> So we might be able to work around this by disabling the color output 
>> in WildFly in our integration tests.
>>
>> OTOH I'm fine with removing the Blue Ocean plugin for now, because 
>> its usability is sometime worse than the default UI's. E.g. when I 
>> click on the build results link in GitHub, 99.999% of the time I want 
>> to see the test results, but Blue Ocean thinks it's much better to 
>> show me some circles with question marks and exclamation points 
>> instead, and then keep me waiting for half a minute after I click on 
>> the tests link :)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Sebastian Laskawiec 
>> <slaskawi at redhat.com <mailto:slaskawi at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hey!
>>
>>     As you probably have heard I'm migrating our TeamCity
>>     installation [1] into Jenkins (temporarily in [2]).
>>
>>     So far I've managed to migrate all Infinispan builds (with pull
>>     requests), C++/C# clients, JGroups and JGroups Kubernetes. I
>>     decided to use the new Pipeline [3] approach for the builds and
>>     keep the configuration along with the code (here's an example [4]).
>>
>>     The configuration builds /refs/pull/<PR>/head/ for Pull Requests
>>     at the moment. I will switch it back to /refs/pull/<PR>/merge/ as
>>     soon as our PR queue size is ~20.
>>
>>     Current pain points are:
>>
>>       * Blue Ocean UI doesn't show tests. It has been reported in
>>         [5]. The workaround is to use the old Jenkins UI.
>>       * Windows VM doesn't start on demand (together with Vittorio we
>>         will be working on this)
>>
>>     The rough plan is:
>>
>>       * Apr 24th, move other 2 agents from TeamCity to Jenkins
>>       * Apr 24th, redirect ci.infinispan.org
>>         <http://ci.infinispan.org> domain
>>       * May 4th, remove TeamCity
>>
>>     Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Sebastian
>>
>>     [1] http://ci.infinispan.org/
>>     [2] http://ec2-52-215-14-157.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com
>>     <http://ec2-52-215-14-157.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com>
>>     [3] https://jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/
>>     <https://jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/>
>>     [4]
>>     https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/master/Jenkinsfile
>>     <https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/blob/master/Jenkinsfile>
>>     [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-43751
>>     <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-43751>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     SEBASTIANŁASKAWIEC
>>
>>     INFINISPAN DEVELOPER
>>
>>     Red HatEMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>>     <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     infinispan-dev mailing list
>>     infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>     <mailto:infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


-- 
Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
JBoss Performance Team



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list