[infinispan-dev] PR labels

Tristan Tarrant ttarrant at redhat.com
Fri Dec 1 03:26:37 EST 2017


Hello people,

I'd like to rationalize the PR labels because I believe some of them are 
useless:

[Ready for review] - Any PR without the [Preview] label must fall under 
this category
[Backport] - The burden should be on the PR owner to create relevant 
backport PRs, not on the reviewer
[Wait CI Results] - PRs should only be integrated after a successful CI 
run (or when failures can be proven to be pre-existing)
[Check CI Failures!] - The CI runs already add failure/success to the PR 
status. Checking CI failures should apply to ALL PRs.
[On Ice] PR should be closed and reopened when relevant again.

Comments/suggestions ?

Tristan
-- 
Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list