[infinispan-dev] PR labels
Tristan Tarrant
ttarrant at redhat.com
Fri Dec 1 03:26:37 EST 2017
Hello people,
I'd like to rationalize the PR labels because I believe some of them are
useless:
[Ready for review] - Any PR without the [Preview] label must fall under
this category
[Backport] - The burden should be on the PR owner to create relevant
backport PRs, not on the reviewer
[Wait CI Results] - PRs should only be integrated after a successful CI
run (or when failures can be proven to be pre-existing)
[Check CI Failures!] - The CI runs already add failure/success to the PR
status. Checking CI failures should apply to ALL PRs.
[On Ice] PR should be closed and reopened when relevant again.
Comments/suggestions ?
Tristan
--
Tristan Tarrant
Infinispan Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list