[infinispan-dev] Why JCache embedded has core as provided dependency

Alan Field afield at redhat.com
Thu Jun 8 14:04:33 EDT 2017


Wasn't the ability to add a single dependency to a project to start using Infinispan the whole purpose for the uber jars? I'm not trying to make an argument for keeping them, because I know they have caused many issues. I just think that if we are going to remove them from Maven, then there should be a way to achieve the same easy developer on boarding that uber jars were supposed to provide. Whether this is Maven project templates, or something else doesn't matter.

Thanks,
Alan

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant at redhat.com>
> To: infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 4:05:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Why JCache embedded has core as provided dependency
> 
> I think we should turn off maven deployment for uber jars.
> 
> Tristan
> 
> On 6/7/17 5:10 PM, Gustavo Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com
> > <mailto:galder at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > 
> >     As far as I see it:
> > 
> >     * infinispan-embedded should never be a dependency in a Maven project.
> > 
> >     * No uber jars should really be used as Maven dependencies because
> >     all the exclusion that fine grained dependencies allow you to do
> >     goes out of the window when all classes are inside a jar. This is
> >     not just theory, I've personally had such issues.
> > 
> >     * Uber jars are designed for Ant or other build tool users that
> >     don't have a dependency resolution engine in place.
> > 
> >     Cheers,
> > 
> >     p.s. I thought we had already discussed this before?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I totally agree. In addition, uberjars should not be an osgi bundle or a
> > jboss module, for similar reasons.
> > 
> > P.S: Even Ant has a dependency mgmt available, which is Ivy.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Gustavo
> > 
> >     --
> >     Galder Zamarreño
> >     Infinispan, Red Hat
> > 
> >      > On 7 Jun 2017, at 11:50, Sebastian Laskawiec <slaskawi at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:slaskawi at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >      >
> >      > Hey,
> >      >
> >      > The change was introduced by this commit [1] and relates to this
> >     JIRAs [2][3]. The root cause is in [3].
> >      >
> >      > Imagine a scenario where you add JCache module to your together
> >     infinispan-embedded. If your classpath was constructed in such a way
> >     that infinispan-embedded was before infinispan-core (classpath is
> >     scanned from left to right in standalone apps), we could get a
> >     relocated (uber jars move some classes into other packages) logger.
> >     That caused class mismatch errors. It is worth to mention that it
> >     will happen to all relocated classes, logger was just an example.
> >     And we need to relocate them, since a user might want to use his
> >     own, newer version of DMR or any other library. So there's no
> >     perfect solution here.
> >      >
> >      > Now a lot of time passed since then and we changed quite a few
> >     things. So this topic probably needs to be revisited.
> >      >
> >      > So the first question that we should ask, shall we allow putting
> >     jcache and infinispan-embedded together on the classpath. If the
> >     answer is yes, I believe it should stay as it is (since the user
> >     always have a choice whether he wants to use jcache with or without
> >     uber jar). The same question needs to be asked for Spring modules as
> >     well as all cache stores. The behavior needs to be consistent across
> >     all those modules.
> >      >
> >      > If the answer is no (which is also valid because jcache is
> >     already present in embedded uber jar), we should migrate all JBoss
> >     Logging references to Infinispan Common Logging (as Tristan did here
> >     [4]) and we can make infinispan-core as a compile time dependency to
> >     jcache. Even though migrating to Infinispan logger is not necessary,
> >     this way we won't break users app which used infinispan-embedded +
> >     jcache approach. Of course the same applies to Spring and Cache
> >     stores modules.
> >      >
> >      > I think the latter approach deserves some exploration. I would
> >     vote for moving that way.
> >      >
> >      > Thanks,
> >      > Sebastian
> >      >
> >      > [1]
> >     https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/commit/720f158cce38d86b292e1ce77b75509342007739
> >     <https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/commit/720f158cce38d86b292e1ce77b75509342007739>
> >      > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6295
> >     <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6295>
> >      > [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6132
> >     <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6132>
> >      > [4] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/4140/files
> >     <https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/4140/files>
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:19 AM Galder Zamarreño
> >     <galder at redhat.com <mailto:galder at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >      > Hi all,
> >      >
> >      > Re:
> >     https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/9417#discussion_r120375579
> >     <https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/pull/9417#discussion_r120375579>
> >      >
> >      > Stéphane makes a good point there, why did we make core provided
> >     dependency? It does feel a bit of a pain that anyone that depends on
> >     jcache embedded also needs to depend on core.
> >      >
> >      > Any more details behind this decision?
> >      >
> >      > Cheers,
> >      > --
> >      > Galder Zamarreño
> >      > Infinispan, Red Hat
> >      >
> >      > --
> >      > SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC
> >      > INFINISPAN DEVELOPER
> >      > Red Hat EMEA
> >      >
> > 
> > 
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     infinispan-dev mailing list
> >     infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> > 
> 
> --
> Tristan Tarrant
> Infinispan Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list