<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 19 Jan 2011, at 15:11, Galder Zamarreņo wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><br>On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Galder Zamarreņo wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite">On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On 18 Jan 2011, at 16:17, Pete Muir wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">12) <a href="http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala">http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala</a><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">For "Cache with Transaction Management" I was not seeing TX semantics being obeyed, I saw the size increment as a added key-value pairs<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></div></blockquote>which cache operation?<br>I imagine the size only increments within the transaction context? i.e. if you suspend the uncommitted transaction and run the same operation again, you don't see transaction's modifications. <br><blockquote type="cite"><div><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Galder, this as well?<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">I'll check it out.<br></blockquote><br>I created <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882</a> - This behaviour is like this since since we accepted (Mircea?) the following community bug report: <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679</a><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font>Can we get an agreement on this? I think it should work as it did originally.<br></div></blockquote></div>You mean cache.values()? should not be tx aware? I think it should be consistent with all the other ops, like put, get etc. (which are tx aware).<div><br><div><br></div></div></body></html>