<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Il 10/11/11 18:14, Mircea Markus ha scritto:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:E5D1020F-895B-4708-A5CE-DA2ECECAA036@jboss.com"
      type="cite">Thanks Sebastiano,
      <div>Would it be possible to issue a pull request with the current
        code? </div>
    </blockquote>
    Yes, of course.<br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:E5D1020F-895B-4708-A5CE-DA2ECECAA036@jboss.com"
      type="cite">
      <div>The two points you mentioned can be added at a further point
        in time.</div>
      <div>I'm asking this because I expect other changes to happen on
        top your&nbsp;TPC-C.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Thanks!</div>
      <div>Mircea&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
      <div><br>
        <div>
          <div>On 10 Nov 2011, at 18:04, Sebastiano Peluso wrote:</div>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
              http-equiv="Content-Type">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi Mircea,<br>
              <br>
              thank you.<br>
              <br>
              Before issuing a pull request I want to make two
              modifications in the code:<br>
              <br>
              &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1) implementing Externalizable interface for the TPC-C
              domain objects (as suggested by Galder Zamarre&ntilde;o);<br>
              <br>
              &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2) changing load/store methods of TPC-C domain classes
              in order to treat domain objects as immutable objects. In
              fact, I have noticed that we can have objects sharing
              among threads belonging to the same node.<br>
              <br>
              Unfortunately I cannot make these modifications before the
              end of the next week because I'm trying to finalize works
              for a close deadline.<br>
              <br>
              Nevertheless I think that you can already use the code for
              benchmarking because the aforementioned "objects sharing"
              problem affects only the application semantics (and it
              doesn't affect cache performances) while Externalizable
              interfaces only make a test run faster.<br>
              <br>
              Let me know if this is ok for you.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Cheers,<br>
              <br>
              &nbsp;&nbsp; Sebastiano<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Il 10/11/11 01:54, Mircea Markus ha scritto:
              <blockquote
                cite="mid:A909FD90-891D-4173-A887-A52EA03FC948@jboss.com"
                type="cite"><br>
                <div>
                  <div>On 7 Nov 2011, at 16:22, Sebastiano Peluso wrote:</div>
                  <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span"
                      style="border-collapse: separate; font-family:
                      Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant:
                      normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing:
                      normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2;
                      text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px;
                      text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows:
                      2; word-spacing: 0px;
                      -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px;
                      -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;
                      -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none;
                      -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;
                      -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium;
                      ">Il 07/11/11 15:05, Galder Zamarre&ntilde;o ha scritto:
                      <blockquote
                        cite="mid:4ECE05F1-A90F-4453-8BFF-DE622D8FB1E3@redhat.com"
                        type="cite">
                        <pre wrap="">Thx Sebastiano. Would you mind issuing a pull request for your tpcc branch so that we can integrate it into Radargun?</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      Yes of course.<span class="Apple-style-span"
                        style="font-family: arial, verdana, sans-serif;
                        font-size: 12px; font-style: normal;
                        font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal;
                        letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal;
                        orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto;
                        text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
                        white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing:
                        0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;
                        -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
                        background-color: rgb(240, 240, 248); display:
                        inline !important; float: none; "><br>
                      </span>
                      <blockquote
                        cite="mid:4ECE05F1-A90F-4453-8BFF-DE622D8FB1E3@redhat.com"
                        type="cite"><br
                          class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                      </blockquote>
                    </span></blockquote>
                </div>
                Hi Sebastiano,
                <div>if you need any help on this please let me know -
                  my transactional improvements are almost
                  finished/currently being reviewed, so I'm really keen
                  to play with TPCC :-)</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>