<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi,<div><br></div><div>Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action.</div><div><br></div><div>Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches:</div><div><br></div><div>1. non transactional: web session replication[1]</div><div>2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2]</div><div>3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3]</div><div><br></div><div>The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions. </div><div><br></div><div>Any other suggestion for benchmarking?</div><div><br></div><div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Mircea</div></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/radargun/wiki/WebSessionBenchmark">http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/radargun/wiki/WebSessionBenchmark</a></div><div>[2] <a href="http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/radargun/wiki/BenchmarkingTransactions">http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/radargun/wiki/BenchmarkingTransactions</a></div><div>[3] tpcc is Radargun extension developed by Sebastiano Peluso from the CloudTM team. It's now integrated in Radargun, I'm working on adding some documentation around it atm.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>