<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 10 Aug 2012, at 13:09, Thomas Fromm wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10.08.2012 13:36, Mircea Markus
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:46F4D253-724C-49D5-A33B-9023F77AB1C2@jboss.com" type="cite"><br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><font class="Apple-style-span"><br>
</font>2) In case I do not have an Reduce job, I'd like to
avoid provide <br>
Reducer. Creating feature request that reducedWith(...) is
optional?<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
As you don't need a reducer, have you considered using the
DistributedExecutorService with a DistributedCallable for that?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I wanted to execute an operation only once on every key, independend
how many nodes are owner of the entry. <br>
The DistCallable approach was my first solution, where I checked at
every node for every entry, if the current node is owner, before I
modified it.<br>
So using the Mapper was a much simpler solution.<br>
</div></blockquote></div><div>I see.</div><div><br></div><br></body></html>