<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22.10.2012 18:16, Manik Surtani
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9533890F-CEAF-4E00-BF34-E56EF52282F7@jboss.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
Wow. Looks like ref counting is a winner. Simple local mode
test, comparing 5.2.0.Beta2 (in red), my fix for ISPN-2381
*without* ref counting (in blue) and with ref counting (in green).
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Weird that read performance is also affected, as these
patches are for the lock manager which is not used when reading.
Could be overall resource contention that slows down reader
threads.</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
[...]<br>
<br>
Thats just in time. I noticed two weeks ago during internal
benchmarks, that the current exclusive locking stuff for write
operations in local caches is expensive. <br>
Looking forward to have this: pull, pull, pull! :-D<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>