<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12-10-23 12:56 PM, Mircea Markus
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:5D14F9A4-0937-4F6C-B9EA-D5E5998C6556@jboss.com"
      type="cite"><br>
      <div>
        <div>On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:54, Manik Surtani wrote:</div>
        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div><br>
            On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:17, Vladimir Blagojevic &lt;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:vblagoje@redhat.com">vblagoje@redhat.com</a>&gt;
            wrote:<br>
            <br>
            <blockquote type="cite">On 12-10-23 11:40 AM, Mircea Markus
              wrote:<br>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite"><br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite">The main reason for passing the
                keys is in order to calculate the <br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite">locality of the task based on
                consistent hash. We don't have a <br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite">reference to the consistent hash
                in the DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy, <br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite">so not sure this would be useful
                as it is.<br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <blockquote type="cite"><br>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
            <blockquote type="cite">You are right Mircea. But we can put
              CH in FailoverContext if needed :-)<br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            And make CH a part of the public API?:/<br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div>It is reachable through the advancedCache.</div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Right, if someone is writing a custom failover policy and he is
    looking to place jobs where the input keys are local he is no
    stranger to CH :-)<br>
    <br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Vladimir<br>
  </body>
</html>