<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12-12-05 10:53 AM, Tristan Tarrant
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50BF6E0B.80807@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Yes.<br>
<br>
Ideally I would like to have:<br>
<br>
GlobalConfigurationBuilder global = new
GlobalConfigurationBuilder();<br>
global<br>
.addExecutor().name("blah");<br>
.addScheduledExecutor().name("sched");<br>
<br>
Configuration config = new Configuration();<br>
config<br>
.clustering().async().replQueueExecutor("blah")<br>
.eviction().executor("sched");<br>
<br>
Don't take the above as a proposed API, it's just to make things
clearer.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Tristan,<br>
<br>
I am a bit slow these days. Apologies! So we would *not* have
well-known predefined executors any more, the way we do now? This
approach seems to allow addition of arbitrarily named executors!
Which is ok I guess, but I am viewing this from a perspective of
Map/Reduce impl code. There we would need to look up a well known
named executor?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Vladimir<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>