<div dir="ltr">I'm ok with not having a receive(MessageBatch) method, I don't see any benefit for Infinispan either.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Bela Ban <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bban@redhat.com" target="_blank">bban@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm not sure adding receive(MessageBatch) to Receiver and to UpHandler<br>
is a benefit to applications. The current implementation simply calls<br>
receive(Message) or up(new Event(Event.MSG, msg)), so each message in a<br>
batch is delivered in turn.<br>
<br>
I thought - if it turns out we need this - I can always add it later,<br>
.e.g. in 4.0 where API breakage is allowed.<br>
<br>
Thoughts ? I know this is pretty knew, so folks have probably not yet<br>
played with this feature...<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1581" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1581</a><br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (<a href="http://www.jgroups.org" target="_blank">http://www.jgroups.org</a>)<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
infinispan-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org">infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>