<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hey,<br>
so I have some good news. I've re-ran my tests for memory
consumption where I store 100MB of data and here's the results for
in-VM mode and client-server with HotRod:<br>
<br>
Previously, the memory overhead for HotRod was (can be found at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://infinispan.blogspot.cz/2013/01/infinispan-memory-overhead.html">http://infinispan.blogspot.cz/2013/01/infinispan-memory-overhead.html</a>):<br>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
entry size -> overhead per entry<br>
512B -> ~174B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
1kB -> ~178B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
10kB -> ~176B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
1MB -> ~245B<br>
<br>
Now it is:<br>
512B -> ~159 (~ -9%)<br>
1kB -> ~159 (~ -11%)<br>
10kB -> ~154 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of
entries stored in mem.)<br>
1MB -> ~184 (the same applies here)<br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
For in-VM mode it was:<br>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
512B -> ~151B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
1kB -> ~151B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
10kB -> ~155B</div>
<div style="font-family: "Courier
New",Courier,monospace;">
1MB -> ~143B<br>
<br>
Now it is:<br>
512B -> ~150 <br>
1kB -> ~150<br>
10kB -> ~149 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of
entries stored in mem.)<br>
1MB -> ~143 (the same applies here)</div>
<br>
<br>
Summary: Almost no change for in-VM mode but a nice improvement
for the HotRod client.<br>
<br>
I can make a blog post once we have this for Memcached and REST. I
guess it is not ready yet.<br>
<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
<br>
Dne 6.5.2013 08:57, Martin Gencur napsal(a):<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:51875440.8090707@redhat.com" type="cite">Hi
Mircea,
<br>
yes, I'll try to run the tests this week.
<br>
<br>
Martin
<br>
<br>
Dne 3.5.2013 00:40, Mircea Markus napsal(a):
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi Martin,
<br>
<br>
The server memory consumption should improve now that we have
ISPN-2281 integrated. would it be possible to run the memory
consumption tests to see where we are?
<br>
<br>
Begin forwarded message:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">I've just integrated the
implementation for ISPN-2281 - great stuff!
<br>
<br>
<br>
As this is a very intrusive change it is important to know
to measure the gain in memory consumption. i.e. would be
great to see some figures on memory usage before this
optimisation and after it in your blog post.
<br>
</blockquote>
^ QE guys have some memory tests already, why don't we get
them to re-run those tests? :)
<br>
</blockquote>
Cheers,
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>