<div dir="ltr"><div>I wouldn't want to deprecate CCL, I think it definitely has a purpose - at least in invalidation mode.<br></div><br>Even in replication mode, having a lazy alternative to state transfer may be useful. Maybe not for the topology cache, but it might make sense for large caches.<br>
<div><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Mircea Markus <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mmarkus@redhat.com" target="_blank">mmarkus@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
On 21 May 2013, at 08:30, Tristan Tarrant <<a href="mailto:ttarrant@redhat.com">ttarrant@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 05/21/2013 08:58 AM, Galder Zamarreņo wrote:<br>
>> Shouldn't it be enabled by default/enforced?<br>
>> ^ Either that, or the cluster cache loader are used, both of which serve the same purpouse.<br>
>><br>
> I think what Mircea is getting at, is that there is an intention to<br>
> deprecate / remove the CCL. I think that we can do that in 6.0 (with the<br>
> CacheStore redesign) and remove all potential users of CCL (including<br>
> the lazy topology transfer).<br>
</div>Mind reader :-)<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
Cheers,<br>
--<br>
Mircea Markus<br>
Infinispan lead (<a href="http://www.infinispan.org" target="_blank">www.infinispan.org</a>)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
infinispan-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org">infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>