<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On 06 Jun 2014, at 15:04, William Burns <<a href="mailto:mudokonman@gmail.com">mudokonman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite">Does that answer your question? Because I’m not sure what you mean by the key being attached to the Tx.<br></blockquote><br>The difference is say you have a tx1 on thread 1 then on the same<br>thread you ask for the group, if it is in the transaction controls<br>whether or not that pending update is seen.<br><br>Example:<br><br> tx1 starts<br> // Note key1 is in group 1<br> cache.put(key1, someValue);<br><br> Set<K> keys = cache.getGroup("group1");<br> // The keys would contain key1 if taking part of transaction.<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Yes that would be necessary.</div></body></html>