<div dir="ltr"><div class="markdown-here-wrapper" style><p style="margin:1.2em 0px!important">Greetings.  :-)</p>
<p style="margin:1.2em 0px!important">I chatted with a few of you offline about this earlier; anyone has any thoughts around a <code style="font-size:0.85em;font-family:Consolas,Inconsolata,Courier,monospace;margin:0px 0.15em;padding:0px 0.3em;white-space:pre-wrap;border:1px solid rgb(234,234,234);border-radius:3px;display:inline;background-color:rgb(248,248,248)">ClusterLoader</code> implementation that, instead of broadcasting to the entire cluster, unicasts to the owners of a given key by inspecting the <code style="font-size:0.85em;font-family:Consolas,Inconsolata,Courier,monospace;margin:0px 0.15em;padding:0px 0.3em;white-space:pre-wrap;border:1px solid rgb(234,234,234);border-radius:3px;display:inline;background-color:rgb(248,248,248)">DistributionManager</code>.  Thinking of using this as a lazy/on-demand form of state transfer in a distributed cluster, so joiners don’t trigger big chunks of data moving around eagerly.</p>
<ul style="margin:1.2em 0px;padding-left:2em">
<li style="margin:0.5em 0px">M</li>
</ul>
<div title="MDH:R3JlZXRpbmdzLiDCoDotKTxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+SSBjaGF0dGVkIHdpdGggYSBmZXcg
b2YgeW91IG9mZmxpbmUgYWJvdXQgdGhpcyBlYXJsaWVyOyBhbnlvbmUgaGFzIGFueSB0aG91Z2h0
cyBhcm91bmQgYSBgQ2x1c3RlckxvYWRlcmAgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gdGhhdCwgaW5zdGVhZCBv
ZiBicm9hZGNhc3RpbmcgdG8gdGhlIGVudGlyZSBjbHVzdGVyLCB1bmljYXN0cyB0byB0aGUgb3du
ZXJzIG9mIGEgZ2l2ZW4ga2V5IGJ5IGluc3BlY3RpbmcgdGhlIGBEaXN0cmlidXRpb25NYW5hZ2Vy
YC4gJm5ic3A7VGhpbmtpbmcgb2YgdXNpbmcgdGhpcyBhcyBhIGxhenkvb24tZGVtYW5kIGZvcm0g
b2Ygc3RhdGUgdHJhbnNmZXIgaW4gYSBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCBjbHVzdGVyLCBzbyBqb2luZXJzIGRv
bid0IHRyaWdnZXIgYmlnIGNodW5rcyBvZiBkYXRhIG1vdmluZyBhcm91bmQgZWFnZXJseS48L2Rp
dj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pi0gTTwvZGl2Pg==" style="height:0;width:0;max-height:0;max-width:0;overflow:hidden;font-size:0em;padding:0;margin:0">​</div></div></div>