[jboss-as7-dev] Subresource references

[Jason T. Greene]

Ah, nevermind then. I replied on the phone thinking you were the other 
Heiko that is using JSON. It's a small change to make JSON more 
readable, so not critical.

On 4/11/11 7:06 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
> the output is taken form the GWT DMR port.
> what did you change? what's needed to synchronize the GWT lib?
>
> Ike
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jason Greene wrote:
>
>> I killed the redundant property value stuff in Json awhile ago. Which version are you running against?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Heiko Braun<hbraun at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Requesting a server group resource I get this:
>>>
>>> {
>>> [INFO]             "PROPERTY_VALUE" : {
>>> [INFO]                 "other-server-group" : {
>>> [INFO]                     "profile" : "default",
>>> [INFO]                     "jvm" : {"default" : {
>>> [INFO]                         "type" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "agent-lib" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "agent-path" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "debug-enabled" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "debug-options" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "env-classpath-ignored" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "environment-variables" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "heap-size" : "64m",
>>> [INFO]                         "max-heap-size" : "512m",
>>> [INFO]                         "java-agent" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "java-home" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "jvm-options" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "permgen-size" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "max-permgen-size" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "stack-size" : null,
>>> [INFO]                         "system-properties" : null
>>> [INFO]                     }},
>>> [INFO]                     "deployment" : {},
>>> [INFO]                     "socket-binding-group" : "standard-sockets"
>>> [INFO]                 }
>>> [INFO]             }
>>> [INFO]         },
>>>
>>>
>>> The pice that's causing me a headache is again the JVm property.
>>> Can we agree that subresources like the JVM in this case are always referenced as ModelNode's of type
>>> property? Similar to the server-group itself? Currently it's returned as type Object, with a property of name 'jvm'
>>>
>>> This would simplify the way to get hold of the subresource name.
>>>
>>> Ike
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev


-- 
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat