[jboss-as7-dev] Subsystem testing harness

[Kabir Khan]

Let me know how you get along. The test harness uses a flat classpath, with no modules. I think this is fine for most subsystems but I'm not sure how that will play out in OSGi land.
On 19 Jul 2011, at 09:31, David Bosschaert wrote:

> Awesome! I'm going to have a play with that today. Was looking for 
> something like this for a while.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 
> On 18/07/2011 18:05, Kabir Khan wrote:
>> There is now a testing harness for testing subsystem parsing, that the operations work, that the model gets updated and services get installed in the service container as expected.
>> 
>> If your subsystem is not totally self contained, the harness provided makes it easy to
>> * Install services your subsystem depends on manually
>> * Add socket bindings, paths and system properties used by your subsystem
>> * Add parsers and other subsystem extensions required by your subsystem
>> 
>> It lives in https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/tree/master/subsystem-test and contains some examples/tests of the harness itself in https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/tree/master/subsystem-test/src/test.
>> 
>> To see it used in the wild, take a look at https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/jmx/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/jmx/JMXSubsystemTestCase.java. As you can see here it
>> * checks that the model exists:
>> https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/jmx/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/jmx/JMXSubsystemTestCase.java#L180
>> * actually bootstraps the controller and uses the services installed by the JMX service (the jmx connector in this case):
>> https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/blob/master/jmx/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/jmx/JMXSubsystemTestCase.java#L186
>> 
>> The JMX subsystem is trivial, but when writing this test I found a few minor bugs. So if you are a subsystem maintainer, I'd highly recommend using this to test your subsystem properly in isolation.
>> 
>> This is based on the stuff that was in the subsystem maven artifact, which now in turn will be based on jboss-as-subsystem-test instead. So, if you find some problems with it try to add to the API rather than changing it, or check with me.
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev