[jboss-as7-dev] A blocker for openshift express work

André Dietisheim adietish at redhat.com
Tue Jun 28 11:26:39 EDT 2011


On 06/28/2011 05:21 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> so yes, Andre just confirmed we see it too.
>
> I assume this came in with the change of not keeping FS deployments in standalone.xml
> and I assume the reason archived gets deployed is that they can get deployed without .dodeploy.
>

yes this must be a new one. I can replicate it with the latest master 
but not with the official beta 3

> /max
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 16:15, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>
>> OK Ill hold off the release for this one.
>>
>> On 6/28/11 9:12 AM, Scott Stark wrote:
>>> This issue is a blocker for me in terms of the openshift express work:
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1130
>>>
>>>
>>>     Unpacked deployment is lost across restarts
>>>     <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-1130>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ideas on starting points for why an unpacked deployment looses its
>>> deployed state across restarts while an archive does not?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>> -- 
>> Jason T. Greene
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev



More information about the jboss-as7-dev mailing list