<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><blockquote type="cite">when creating a datasource.<br></blockquote>As a deployment, it's easy. But deploying it as a module is more involved and most of it is boilerplate<a href="http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DataSourceConfigurationinAS7#Installing_a_JDBC_driver_as_a_module">http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DataSourceConfigurationinAS7#Installing_a_JDBC_driver_as_a_module</a>. So I was thinking if we should simplify adding it as a module via admin console (autogenerate the module.xml and other stuff based on the user input) or even the CLI perhaps. Having said that, I don't know how many users will be opting for deploying the JDBC driver as a module.</span></blockquote><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The question is: why would you chose a module configuration opposed to a deployment?</div><div>To be honest, I cannot tell the difference. It will probably have a different scope/visibility, no?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Ike</div><div><br></div><br></body></html>