<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>no, but if possible they should rely on the default schema (xsd) for defining inlined thread pool configurations.</div><br><div><div>On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:50 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">It seems that the latter defines pools that are used in<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>/subsystem=ejb3/service=*<br>Should they not be using thread pools defined in the threads subsystem<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><br>instead?</span></blockquote></div><br></body></html>