<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.18.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Just found a related comment on <A HREF="http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-803">http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-803</A> :<BR>
<BR>
"The current failsafe verification could be modified to consider results for multiple executions."<BR>
<BR>
That sounds like it would not work as it is now.<BR>
See the discussion at jira. More info later.<BR>
<BR>
Ondra<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Ondřej Žižka píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 17:47 +0100:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<BR>
Ondřej Žižka píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 17:19 +0100:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
Hi all,<BR>
<BR>
Do we have any experience with Maven Failsafe plugin?<BR>
It's like surefire, but the test process is split to two goals: running tests and checking the results.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
To save you from some searching:<BR>
<A HREF="http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/">http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/</A><BR>
<A HREF="http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/integration-test-mojo.html">http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/integration-test-mojo.html</A><BR>
<A HREF="http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html">http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
They're bound to different phases by default. Which leads me to:<BR>
<BR>
Would it solve our "two executions" problem? Are there some gotchas?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Additional info from John Casey:<BR>
<BR>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT COLOR="#204a87">(17:07:11) </FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#204a87">OndrejZizka: Is</FONT><FONT COLOR="#909090"> new functionality added to surefire automatically added to failsafe too?</FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT COLOR="#204a87">(17:07:17) </FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#204a87">OndrejZizka: </FONT><FONT COLOR="#909090">like, groups, for instance</FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT COLOR="#204a87">(17:07:27) </FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#204a87">OndrejZizka: </FONT><FONT COLOR="#909090">and support for newer junit etc</FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT COLOR="#cc0000">(17:07:57) </FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#cc0000">jdcasey: </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">you mean code-wise? yeah, I think so</FONT><BR>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT COLOR="#cc0000">(17:08:21) </FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#cc0000">jdcasey: </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000">they made a huge effort not long ago to synchronize those plugins, and IIRC they're in the same codebase in SVN now</FONT><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Ondra<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Ondřej Žižka píše v Pá 02. 12. 2011 v 06:47 +0100:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
1-3) is currently done by a combination of modules and Surefire executions.<BR>
The problem with the later is that a failure in one execution prevents the successive from running.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<PRE>
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org">jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org</A>
<A HREF="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev</A>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE>
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org">jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org</A>
<A HREF="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev</A>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>