<html><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">I don't think this is
worth it. Any change like this at this point is going to break users
existing scripts, for no real benefit. <br>
<br>
I also don't really think that two tab completions are to many, and if
someone is using it enough that it is an annoyance they can just create
an alias anyway.<br>
<br>
Stuart<br>
<br>
<blockquote style="border: 0px none;"
cite="mid:5040E5CA.9020609@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div style="margin:30px 25px 10px 25px;" class="__pbConvHr"><div
style="display:table;width:100%;border-top:1px solid
#EDEEF0;padding-top:5px"> <div
style="display:table-cell;vertical-align:middle;padding-right:6px;"><img
photoaddress="cfang@redhat.com" photoname="Cheng Fang"
src="cid:part1.04010609.01040201@gmail.com"
name="compose-unknown-contact.jpg" width="25px" height="25px"></div> <div
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;width:100%">
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cfang@redhat.com"
style="color:#737F92
!important;padding-right:6px;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none
!important;">Cheng Fang</a></div> <div
style="display:table-cell;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:middle;">
<font color="#9FA2A5"><span style="padding-left:6px">1 September 2012
2:26 AM</span></font></div></div></div>
<div style="color:#888888;margin-left:24px;margin-right:24px;"
__pbrmquotes="true" class="__pbConvBody"><div>I've been playing with
jboss as7 cli and like to share my experience. I <br>understand that in
AS7-2310, it was renamed from jboss-admin.sh to <br>jboss-cli.sh, so a
second renaming seems disruptive, but anyway here it <br>goes...<br><br>First,
can we remove the .sh file extension? Tools like ant, mvn and <br>groovy
are all shell scripts but do not have the .sh extension. Users <br>just
need to execute it, without concerning if it is written as a shell <br>script
to binary. Having the .sh extension limits ourselves in impl <br>options.
On Windows we continue to have .bat, which is unavoidable, but <br>users
just need to run "jboss-cli" with .bat extension.<br><br>jboss-cli.sh
is quite some typing for users, and the first TAB <br>completion will
not enough. It takes 2 tabs to complete jboss-cli.sh<br><br>Secondly,
can we remove the -cli part to further simplify the name? It <br>seems
to be superfluous as many terminal commands are cli. IMO, a name <br>needs
to reflect the purpose of the tool, rather than its form. By <br>having
-cli in the name, we are again restricting it to be a cli tool. <br>But
didn't we have a GUI form that can be launched by 'jboss-cli.sh --gui'?<br><br>I
personally like the old name jboss-admin.sh better, except that it's <br>too
long.<br><br>Cheng<br>_______________________________________________<br>jboss-as7-dev
mailing list<br><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org">jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev</a><br></div></div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>