<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<tt>I agree, that there is value in a modular build. Its tracked by
<a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-5494">[AS7-5494] Add
support for a modular AS7 build</a><br>
<br>
It would also allow other projects to decouple from the AS7
release cycle and provide a minimalistic runtime to support their
stuff. Specifically, I'm interested to go back to a more
predictable release cycle for the jbosgi and again include a
standalone runtime with our distribution. The runtime would be AS7
based, include the osgi subsystem and possibly other subsystems we
integrate with (e.g. naming, transaction, jmx, web, ...)<br>
<br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/04/2012 12:58 PM, Thomas Diesler
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5045DEC2.1060502@jboss.com" type="cite">This
probably needs to be a community driven effort. A "product in its
own right" actually triggers an armada of jboss/redhat folks to do
additional work on top of what we put out as a community project.
This would only be done if justified by sufficient interest.
<br>
<br>
A good starting point would be to modify the build such that is
supports configurable subsystems. From a modular service container
perspective it's probably worth to stick with the standards and
use the osgi only profile.
<br>
<br>
On 09/03/2012 09:48 PM, Olaf Bergner wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">While I think that JBoss AS 7's
architecture and implementation are
<br>
outstanding neither I nor the company I'm working for have a
need for a
<br>
JEE container. What we *do* have a need for, though, is a
robust,
<br>
performant, flexibel and manageable runtime for deploying our
networked
<br>
services in. Having taken a look at JBoss AS 7's Modular Service
<br>
Container, its extension mechanism, its flexibel configuration
model and
<br>
the fact that it's based on JBoss Modules I started to think
that a
<br>
JBoss AS 7 distribution stripped down to its core just might fit
the bill.
<br>
<br>
Beyond creating that minimal distribution itself I think all it
would
<br>
take is to add some documentation, especially on how to use the
Modular
<br>
Service Container, something I couldn't find *any* documentation
for.
<br>
Plus maybe a sample application or two. Provided someone in the
know
<br>
volunteered to assist me I would be more than willing to provide
those.
<br>
<br>
What do you think?
<br>
<br>
Regards,
<br>
Olaf
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org">jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
JBoss OSGi Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
</pre>
</body>
</html>