[jboss-cvs] JBossAS SVN: r77227 - projects/docs/enterprise/4.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/pt-BR.
jboss-cvs-commits at lists.jboss.org
jboss-cvs-commits at lists.jboss.org
Wed Aug 20 02:16:29 EDT 2008
Author: ldelima at redhat.com
Date: 2008-08-20 02:16:29 -0400 (Wed, 20 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 77227
Modified:
projects/docs/enterprise/4.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/pt-BR/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.po
Log:
translation ongoing
Modified: projects/docs/enterprise/4.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/pt-BR/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.po
===================================================================
--- projects/docs/enterprise/4.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/pt-BR/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.po 2008-08-20 06:14:53 UTC (rev 77226)
+++ projects/docs/enterprise/4.3/Cache/Cache_FAQ/pt-BR/Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.po 2008-08-20 06:16:29 UTC (rev 77227)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
"Project-Id-Version: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: http://bugs.kde.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-05-30 03:54+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2008-08-20 16:14+1000\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2008-08-20 16:16+1000\n"
"Last-Translator: Leticia de Lima <ldelima at redhat.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <en at li.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
@@ -1647,12 +1647,14 @@
"In aopc, you specify the src path for a specific directory. To pre-compile "
"multiple ones, you will need to invoke aopc multiple times."
msgstr ""
+"In aopc, you specify the src path for a specific directory. To pre-compile "
+"multiple ones, you will need to invoke aopc multiple times."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1263
#, no-c-format
msgid "What's in the <literal>jboss-aop.xml</literal> configuration?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "What's in the <literal>jboss-aop.xml</literal> configuration?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1270
@@ -1667,6 +1669,14 @@
"CacheInterceptor</literal> to this POJO to perform object mapping and "
"relationship management."
msgstr ""
+"<literal>jboss-aop.xml</literal> is needed for POJO instrumentation. In "
+"<literal>jboss-aop.xml</literal> , you can declare your POJO (e.g., "
+"<literal>Person</literal> ) to be \"prepared\", a JBossAop term to denote "
+"that the object will be \"aspectized\" by the system. After this "
+"declaration, JBossAop will invoke any interceptor that associates with this "
+"POJO. PojoCache will dynamically add an <literal>org.jboss.cache.aop."
+"CacheInterceptor</literal> to this POJO to perform object mapping and "
+"relationship management."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1288
@@ -1675,12 +1685,14 @@
"Note that to add your POJO, you should declare all the fields to be "
"\"prepared\" as in the example."
msgstr ""
+"Note that to add your POJO, you should declare all the fields to be "
+"\"prepared\" as in the example."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1296
#, no-c-format
msgid "Can I use annotation instead of the xml declaration?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "Can I use annotation instead of the xml declaration?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1300
@@ -1689,12 +1701,14 @@
"Yes, starting with JBossCache 1.3, you can use annotation to instrument your "
"POJO for both JDK1.4 and 1.5. Check the documentation for details."
msgstr ""
+"Yes, starting with JBossCache 1.3, you can use annotation to instrument your "
+"POJO for both JDK1.4 and 1.5. Check the documentation for details."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1308
#, no-c-format
msgid "What are the pro and con of xml vs. annotation?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "What are the pro and con of xml vs. annotation?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1312
@@ -1706,6 +1720,11 @@
"the annotation, you'd probably change it rarely since there is no parameters "
"to tune, for example."
msgstr ""
+"It really depends on your organization environment, I'd say, since this can "
+"be turned into a hot debate. Having said that, I feel strongly that POJO "
+"annotation is well suited for PojoCache. This is because once you specify "
+"the annotation, you'd probably change it rarely since there is no parameters "
+"to tune, for example."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1324
@@ -1715,6 +1734,9 @@
"and <literal>@org.jboss.cache.aop.annotation.Serializable</literal> field "
"level annotations?"
msgstr ""
+"What are the <literal>@org.jboss.cache.aop.annotation.Transient</literal> "
+"and <literal>@org.jboss.cache.aop.annotation.Serializable</literal> field "
+"level annotations?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1333
@@ -1725,6 +1747,10 @@
"as declaring a field <literal>transient</literal> . PojoCache won't put this "
"field under management."
msgstr ""
+"Starting in 1.4, we also offer two additional field-level annotations. The "
+"first one, <literal>@Transient</literal> , when applied has the same effect "
+"as declaring a field <literal>transient</literal> . PojoCache won't put this "
+"field under management."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1341
@@ -1734,12 +1760,15 @@
"PojoCache to treat the field as a Serializable object even when it is "
"<literal>@PojoCacheable</literal> ."
msgstr ""
+"The second one, <literal>@Serializable</literal> when applied, will cause "
+"PojoCache to treat the field as a Serializable object even when it is "
+"<literal>@PojoCacheable</literal> ."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1353
#, no-c-format
msgid "What about compile-time vs. load-time instrumentation then?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "What about compile-time vs. load-time instrumentation then?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1357
@@ -1750,6 +1779,10 @@
"the development stage). In addition, once I generate the new class, there is "
"no more steps needed."
msgstr ""
+"Again it depends. But my preference is to do compile-time instrumentation "
+"via aopc. I prefer this approach because it is easier to debug (at least at "
+"the development stage). In addition, once I generate the new class, there is "
+"no more steps needed."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1368
@@ -1758,6 +1791,8 @@
"Is it possible to store the same object multiple times but with different "
"Fqn paths? Like /foo/byName and /foo/byId ?"
msgstr ""
+"Is it possible to store the same object multiple times but with different "
+"Fqn paths? Like /foo/byName and /foo/byId ?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1374
@@ -1767,6 +1802,9 @@
"reference. PojoCache manages the unique object through association of the "
"dynamic cache interceptor."
msgstr ""
+"Yes, you can use PojoCache to do that. It supports the notion of object "
+"reference. PojoCache manages the unique object through association of the "
+"dynamic cache interceptor."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1383
@@ -1775,6 +1813,8 @@
"Do I need to declare all my objects \"prepared\" in <literal>jboss-aop.xml</"
"literal> ?"
msgstr ""
+"Do I need to declare all my objects \"prepared\" in <literal>jboss-aop.xml</"
+"literal> ?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1390
@@ -1785,12 +1825,16 @@
"treat this object as a \"primitive\" type. However, the object will need to "
"implement <literal>Serializable</literal> interface for replication."
msgstr ""
+"Not necessarily. If there is an object that you don't need the cache to "
+"manage for you, you can leave it out of the declaration. The cache will "
+"treat this object as a \"primitive\" type. However, the object will need to "
+"implement <literal>Serializable</literal> interface for replication."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1402
#, no-c-format
msgid "Can the cache aop intercept update via reflection?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "Can the cache aop intercept update via reflection?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1406
@@ -1800,6 +1844,9 @@
"therefore PojoCache will not be able to perform the necessary "
"synchronization."
msgstr ""
+"No. The update via reflection will not be intercepted in JBossAop and "
+"therefore PojoCache will not be able to perform the necessary "
+"synchronization."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1415
@@ -1808,6 +1855,8 @@
"When I declare my POJO to be \"aspectized\", what happens to the fields with "
"transient, static, and final modifiers?"
msgstr ""
+"When I declare my POJO to be \"aspectized\", what happens to the fields with "
+"transient, static, and final modifiers?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1421
@@ -1816,6 +1865,8 @@
"PojoCache currently will ignore the fields with these modifiers. That is, it "
"won't put these fields into the cache (and thus no replication either)."
msgstr ""
+"PojoCache currently will ignore the fields with these modifiers. That is, it "
+"won't put these fields into the cache (and thus no replication either)."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1430
@@ -1824,6 +1875,8 @@
"What are those keys such as <literal>JBoss:internal:class</literal> and "
"<literal>AOPInstance</literal> ?"
msgstr ""
+"What are those keys such as <literal>JBoss:internal:class</literal> and "
+"<literal>AOPInstance</literal> ?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1439
@@ -1832,12 +1885,14 @@
"They are for internal use only. Users should ignore these keys and values in "
"the node hashmap."
msgstr ""
+"They are for internal use only. Users should ignore these keys and values in "
+"the node hashmap."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1447
#, no-c-format
msgid "What about Collection classes? Do I need to declare them \"prepared\"?"
-msgstr ""
+msgstr "What about Collection classes? Do I need to declare them \"prepared\"?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1453
@@ -1851,6 +1906,13 @@
"Collection classes APIs. That is, the system classes won't be invoked when "
"used in PojoCache."
msgstr ""
+"No. Since the Collection classes such as <literal>ArrayList</literal> are "
+"java util classes, aop by default won't instrument these classes. Instead, "
+"PojoCache will generate a dynamic class proxy for the Collection classes "
+"(upon the <literal>putObject</literal> call is invoked). The proxy will "
+"delegate the operations to a cache interceptor that implements the actual "
+"Collection classes APIs. That is, the system classes won't be invoked when "
+"used in PojoCache."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1465
@@ -1862,6 +1924,11 @@
"<literal>ArrayList</literal> and <literal>LinkedList</literal> will have the "
"same implementation. Plan is currently underway to optimize these APIs."
msgstr ""
+"Internally, the cache interceptor implements the APIs by direct interaction "
+"with respect to the underlying cache store. Note that this can have "
+"implications in performance for certain APIs. For example, both "
+"<literal>ArrayList</literal> and <literal>LinkedList</literal> will have the "
+"same implementation. Plan is currently underway to optimize these APIs."
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1480
@@ -1870,6 +1937,8 @@
"How do I use <literal>List</literal> , <literal>Set</literal> , and "
"<literal>Map</literal> dynamic proxy?"
msgstr ""
+"How do I use <literal>List</literal> , <literal>Set</literal> , and "
+"<literal>Map</literal> dynamic proxy?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1492
@@ -1880,6 +1949,10 @@
"them \"aspectized\". It is done via a dynamic proxy. Here is a code snippet "
"to use an <literal>ArrayList</literal> proxy class."
msgstr ""
+"PojoCache supports classes extending from <literal>List</literal> , "
+"<literal>Set</literal> , and <literal>Map</literal> without users to declare "
+"them \"aspectized\". It is done via a dynamic proxy. Here is a code snippet "
+"to use an <literal>ArrayList</literal> proxy class."
#. Tag: programlisting
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1504
@@ -1924,6 +1997,8 @@
"What is the proper way of assigning two different keys with Collection class "
"object?"
msgstr ""
+"What is the proper way of assigning two different keys with Collection class "
+"object?"
#. Tag: para
#: Cache_Frequently_Asked_Questions.xml:1516
More information about the jboss-cvs-commits
mailing list