[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBMICROCONT-181 & ManagedDeployments

[charles.crouch@jboss.com]

"scott.stark at jboss.org" wrote : 
  | I don't know that I so much disagree as don't want to get too hung up on making this a required feature initially. Certainly in principle the default jmx console could use this to generate a much better default view of the admin capabilities. Its just not a required feature in order for an admin tool to be able to effectively manage a server.
  | 

Thats a better way to put it Scott. Its not that its a bad thing to care about, there are just lots more important things to care about instead.

Adrian, I wasn't arguing against innovation in the management layer as defined by the developer. It would be the responsibility of whoever maintained the console to make sure any integration layer with the app server's manageable components stayed in sync.

I agree that assuming core dev's will maintain a separate management piece, external to their own annotations etc, is unrealistic. However I believe its equally unlikely that developers would want/be able to provide sufficient metadata to enable any dynamically driven management and administration console to have sufficient usability. It would more likely boil down to a lowest common denominator, much like the current jmx-console.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4068238#4068238

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4068238