[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: classloading dependencies
adrian@jboss.org
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Feb 10 07:12:22 EST 2009
"jhalliday" wrote :
| > That's already been fixed
|
| .. but the fix is not in AS branch 5.x yet.
|
The fix is in Branch_5_0
| 12:54:24,440 INFO [ServerImpl] Release ID: JBoss [Morpheus] 5.0.1.GA (build: SVNTag=JBoss_5_0_1_GA date=200902091457)
| <snip/>
| 12:54:32,351 WARN [RequirementDependencyItem] VFSClassLoaderPolicyModule bindings-classloader:0.0.0 resolved ModuleRequirement{jmx-classloader [0.0.0,?)} to VFSClassLoaderPolicyModule jmx-classloader:0.0.0 which has import-all=true. Cannot check its consistency.
|
anonymous wrote :
| One further question: Assuming I have a choice between the -beans.xml and -classloading.xml techniques for specifying the dependency, what is considered best practice? This is for a transactions demo app we'll be shipping from JBoss, so if there is a 'right way' of doing things I guess I should use it :-)
Best practice is to depend upon packages rather than modules
because it is less susceptable to refactoring problems.
That requires the jboss-classloading.xml
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208510#4208510
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208510
More information about the jboss-dev-forums
mailing list