[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: super-state, scope or something else

kukeltje do-not-reply at jboss.com
Fri May 15 06:15:58 EDT 2009


why not use 'group' (yes, I know, it is the bpmn terminology so it might introduce expectations)? It is no real state, super in super-state was to me always confusing in relation to sub-process.

Regarding the wait, would'nt it be nice to introduce 'synonyms' so wait would also be possible?


View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231261#4231261

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231261



More information about the jboss-dev-forums mailing list