[jboss-dev] Re: Fwd: AS 5 Beta 2 Discussion

[Andrig T Miller]

I agree.  In fact, we specifically created 4.2 for these types of
issues.  With the inclusion of EJB 3 in 4.2 as fully supported
technology, we should make this as clean as possible.

Andy

On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:11 -0800, Scott M Stark wrote:

> Yes, its work to align the remoting uses. This has to be done for
> jboss5, and ejb3 pulls this issue into 4.2. I don't see keeping the
> legacy remoting layers as default as beneficial for 4.2.
> 
> Tom Elrod wrote:
> >> 2. A related issue is alignment on jboss-remoting transports. There was
> >> a jira issue to make the pooled invoker the default. The real question
> >> is why don't we move to the unified invoker based on remoting to align
> >> the transports between 4.2/5/ejb3.
> >
> > I was thinking the main reason we didn't switch to using unified
> > invokers for 4.x was due to needing to update docs and training
> > materials (since config would be completely different).  However, if
> > this is not an issue and would prefer to switch default to be unified
> > invoker for 4.2, the change to standardjboss.xml, jboss-service.xml,
> > and cluster-service.xml is simple (but still have the issue of where
> > else needs to be changed, such as client user tx, testsuite, jmx
> > invoker, etc.).
> 

Andrig (Andy) Miller
VP, Engineering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/attachments/20061129/02578558/attachment.html