[jboss-dev] AS5 boot screwed up

[Francisco Reverbel]

Before stopping that work I went a bit further with the "alternative
strategy" and had most stuff working (JBossTS was being deployed
correctly, etc.), but still had to deal with issues related to the
ServerSessionPoolLoader.

On 10/4/07, Adrian <abrock at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think you're correct, there's lots of little commits. :-(
>
> After reverting the transaction module change, I've now got
> problems with the MDB's ServerSessionPool.
>
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException : No ClassLoaders found for:
> org.jboss.jms.asf.ServerSessionPoolLoader
>         at
> org.jboss.mx.loading.LoadMgr3.beginLoadTask(LoadMgr3.java:306)
>         at
> org.jboss.mx.loading.UnifiedClassLoader.loadClassImpl (
> UnifiedClassLoader.java:290)
>
>
> An alternative strategy would be try to complete Francisco's
> change by fixing the main configuration of the server.
>
> But this will leave lots of broken tests in the testsuite
> until they are also updated with the correct configuration.
>
> e.g. MDB tests with specific JMSContainerInvoker configuration
> will fail until they are updated to use the JCA 1.5 inbound resource
> adapter config.
>
> e.g.2 There's still lots of tests using the now
> non-existant org.jboss.tm.TxManager on the client side.
>
> Also, the embedded project is broken since it hasn't yet been
> updated to use the new TM.
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:47 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> > Those are the revision numbers (first one was last):
> >
> > Should we revert one by one in reverse order?
> >
> > 65826, 65825, 65820, 65819, 65818, 65817, 65816, 65815, 65814, 65813,
> 65812, 65811, 65810,
> > 65809, 65808, 65807, 65806
> >
> > Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> > > I just noticed Franscisco's check-ins this morning. I think we need to
> > > revert the changes for now, but unfortunately the check-ins done were
> > > multiple.
> > >
> > > Adrian wrote:
> > >> Why has the transaction module been removed?
> > >>
> > >> The stuff required to make this work properly is still WIP:
> > >> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4516
> > >>
> > >> In fact, I'm currently working on fixing up the testsuite
> > >> to make this possible at all.
> > >>
> > >> The XIDFactory stuff is expected as per the subtask:
> > >> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4517
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:12 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> > >>> After the removal of the transaction module, booting the 'default'
> > >>> and 'all' configs complains initially for the missing
> > >>> org.jboss.tm.XidFactory, then about missing jbossts libs...
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> jboss-development mailing list
> > >>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jboss-development mailing list
> > > jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> > _______________________________________________
> > jboss-development mailing list
> > jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> --
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Adrian Brock
> Chief Scientist
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/attachments/20071004/369f4f20/attachment.html