[jboss-dev] Reverted VFS to 2.2.0.M1 (& hudson madness)

[Ales Justin]

VFS 2.2.0.M1 has .war cleanup bug
VFS 2.2.0.M2 has TS issues + Iterator.remove bug
VFS 2.2.0.M3 has TS issues

Seam-int 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT excludes plugins/*.jar from scan

If you could wait for some VFS 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT from Jason
(it depends how fast he can provide it)
that would be the best choice.

Otherwise do your pick. :-)

Shelly McGowan wrote:
> Ales,
> 
> So, we want to test with VFS 2.2.0.M1 and seam-int 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
> 
> 
> Shelly
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ales Justin" <ales.justin at gmail.com>
> To: "JBoss.org development list" <jboss-development at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:13:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] Reverted VFS to 2.2.0.M1 (& hudson madness)
> 
> Can we also change the Seam-int to 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
> (Or Shelly, you already did this?)
> 
> This should fix the performance issue EmbJopr is having with
> VFSScanner going "into" plugins/*.jar files.
> 
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Since this weekends hudson meltdown seems likely related to a memory 
>> leak, I have reverted VFS to M1. Recent updates to the VFS have been 
>> observed to leak (JBAS-6805). This is potentially caused by a thread 
>> safety issue introduced in M2. Shelly has kicked off another 5.1 testrun 
>> with this update, and is checking to see see if M1 resolved 6805.
>>
>> In the meantime I am working on an update to the VFS that does not have 
>> the recent TS issues.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>