[jboss-dev] Re: XML Schema for JGroups - annotations galore

[Brian Stansberry]

Ask on jboss-development at lists.jboss.org. It's a totally appropriate 
question for the list and you're more likely to get an answer since a 
number of more technical people kinda ignore thecore.

Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> Do you think it is inappropriate to ask for help on the core regarding 
> this issue? I am ripping my hair out by now trying to figure this one out!
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 1/21/09 4:52 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>> On 1/20/09 1:55 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>> You should specify a namespace using targetNamespace, so that 
>>> components like JBC can inline the jgroups config into the JBC 
>>> config. Current practice is to use a URN style URL for the namespace 
>>> instead of http. I would also recommend bundling the schema in the 
>>> jgroups jar in META-INF/schemas so that you can optionally enable 
>>> schema validation without requiring the schema file in the install.
>> Do you mean having a schema declaration start like this:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
>> targetNamespace="urn:org:jgroups">
>>
>> If I have a jgroups conf file:
>>
>> <config xmlns="urn:org:jgroups"
>>         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>         
>> xsi:schemaLocation="file:/Users/vladimir/workspace/JGroups-HEAD/JGroups-2.7.xsd"> 
>>
>> <UDP
>>          mcast_addr="${jgroups.udp.mcast_addr:232.10.10.10}"
>>          mcast_port="${jgroups.udp.mcast_port:45588}"
>>          ....
>>
>>
>> then for some reason my editor (Oxygen) always reports that conf file 
>> is well formed - even if it clearly is not.
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vladimir
>>
> 


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com