[jboss-dev] ejb3 interop between different versions

[David M. Lloyd]

Doubt it, especially if EJB3 does start using Remoting 3 for 6.  Though I 
imagine that R3 could be backported into 4 or 5 if one were sufficiently 
motivated,  I'm not so sure about the EJB3 side. :-)

- DML

On 10/30/2009 03:31 AM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>   >  Calling EJB3 beans over major releases doesn't work.
>   >  If we truly ever want something like that then we need to have isolated
>   >  class loading bound to JNDI proxies, so that a proxy will use the right
>   >  client class versions.
>
> It is never going to work if you don't plan for it. Customers will ask for this, and in fact
> many will expect this to work, so prepare a workaround for 4<->5 and put it in your roadmaps
> for 5<->6 :-)
>
> I mean it might be hard to do it between 4 and 5, but between 5&  6 where the codebase is
> uniform it should be easy to make it work without isolated classloading.
>
> /D
>
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> On 10/29/2009 06:54 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> A user is trying to call ejb3 beans from AS 5.1 ->   AS 4.2.3
>>> http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4263032#4263032
>>>
>>> I believe we do not cover this scenario in our compatibility matrix
>>> tests? All we test is
>>> ejb2 access.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't we provide "some" ejb3 compatibility guarantees (&   testing)
>>> going forward?
>>>
>>> /Dimitris
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development