[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (EJBTHREE-436) partition name should not be part of the @clustered annotation
Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
jira-events at jboss.com
Mon Jul 24 09:57:11 EDT 2006
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-436?page=all ]
Brian Stansberry closed EJBTHREE-436.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
See http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-424 which will give you the same control over the partition name that you get with EJB 2.0.
> partition name should not be part of the @clustered annotation
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: EJBTHREE-436
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-436
> Project: EJB 3.0
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Clustering
> Affects Versions: EJB 3.0 RC4 - PFD
> Reporter: Martin Welss
> Assigned To: Bill Burke
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: EJB 3.0 RC9 - FD
>
>
> Why is the partition name part of the ejb-clustering annotation?
> Suppose there are three clusters: one for integration, one for test, one for production and each has a distinct partition name. It would not be possible to 'move' an application from integration to test without changing the code!
> And because of the attributes default value, there is no way to say to the bean 'never mind the partition name, just run everywhere'
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list