[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-2011) Calling addPackage causes rules that use "collect" to incorrectly fire.
Edson Tirelli (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Apr 7 19:31:22 EDT 2009
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Edson Tirelli closed JBRULES-2011.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
Although the Drools 4.0.x API is permissive and allow you to do what you are doing, it is completely wrong and may cause undeterministic behavior:
// THE FOLLOWING IS WRONG
Vector<Rule> rulesVector = new Vector<Rule>();
Rule[] packageRules = pack.getRules();
{
for (Rule rule : packageRules) {
rulesVector.add(rule);
}
}
rules.removePackage(pack.getName());
for (Rule rule : rulesVector) {
pkg.addRule(rule);
}
The right way of doing is to simply get the new package with the updated rules and add it to the rulebase. The rulebase will replace an old rule by a new one if they have the same name, or merge the new rules into the rulebase if they have different names.
Drools 5 is exposing a much more restrictive and safer API, that will help users avoid such mistakes.
If I misunderstood your case, just let me know, with further explanation.
Thanks,
Edson
> Calling addPackage causes rules that use "collect" to incorrectly fire.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBRULES-2011
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2011
> Project: JBoss Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 4.0.7
> Environment: Windows XP using Java version 1.6.
> Reporter: Janneman Robinson
> Assignee: Edson Tirelli
> Original Estimate: 1 hour
> Remaining Estimate: 1 hour
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Create a rulebase containing at least one Package. The package should contain at least one rule that uses the "collect" statement (ie, with a condition on how many elements are collected) and no additional conditional elements in the LHS of the rule.
> 2. Request a new StatefulSession using myRuleBase.newStatefulSession() or myRuleBase.newStatefulSession(true).
> 3. Add an altered package to the RuleBase using myRuleBase.addPackage(x);
> Expected:
> nothing
> Result: the call to addPackage causes a "fireAllRules". During this process, rules that depend on a "collect" statement are executed whether or not the conditioned number of facts collected was met.
> I am sorry not having the time to further investigate different combinations and/or versions of the software myself.
> Below is a testcase that demonstrates the behaviour. Note: myRuleBase.newStatefulSession(false) does not cause this behaviour.
> public class TestAddPkg extends TestCase {
> private static boolean alarmRaised;
> public static void raiseAlarm() {
> alarmRaised = true;
> }
> public void testKeepReferenceFalse() throws Exception {
> alarmRaised = false;
> RuleBase rules = null;
> rules = addSourceToRules(createRule1(), rules);
> rules.newStatefulSession(false);
> rules = addSourceToRules(createRule2(), rules);
> // We never inserted any alarms, so...
> assertFalse(alarmRaised);
> }
> public void testKeepReferenceTrue() throws Exception {
> alarmRaised = false;
> RuleBase rules = null;
> rules = addSourceToRules(createRule1(), rules);
> rules.newStatefulSession(true);
> rules = addSourceToRules(createRule2(), rules);
> // We never inserted any alarms, so...
> assertFalse(alarmRaised);
> }
> private RuleBase addSourceToRules(String source, RuleBase rules) throws DroolsParserException, IOException,
> Exception {
> System.out.println(source);
> StringReader reader = new StringReader(source);
> PackageBuilder builder = new PackageBuilder();
> builder.addPackageFromDrl(reader);
> Package pkg = builder.getPackage();
> if (rules == null) {
> rules = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase();
> rules.addPackage(pkg);
> }
> else {
> Package[] packages = rules.getPackages();
> for (Package pack : packages) {
> if (pack.getName().equals(pkg.getName())) {
> Vector<Rule> rulesVector = new Vector<Rule>();
> Rule[] packageRules = pack.getRules();
> {
> for (Rule rule : packageRules) {
> rulesVector.add(rule);
> }
> }
> rules.removePackage(pack.getName());
> for (Rule rule : rulesVector) {
> pkg.addRule(rule);
> }
> }
> }
> rules.addPackage(pkg);
> }
> return rules;
> }
> public class Alarm {
> private String level;
> public Alarm(String level) {
> this.level = level;
> }
> public void setLevel(String level) {
> this.level = level;
> }
> public String getLevel() {
> return level;
> }
> }
> private String createRule2() {
> StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
> sb.append("package alarms; \n");
> sb.append("import java.util.ArrayList; \n");
> sb.append("TestAddPkg; \n");
> sb.append("TestAddPkg.Alarm; \n");
> sb.append("rule highLvlAlarm \n");
> sb.append("when \n");
> sb.append(" $a : ArrayList(size > 0) from collect (Alarm( level != \"low\") )\n");
> sb.append("then \n");
> sb.append(" // callTheCops(); \n");
> sb.append(" TestAddPkg.raiseAlarm(); \n");
> sb.append(" System.out.println(\">>>Police alerted.<<<\"); \n");
> sb.append("end \n");
> return sb.toString();
> }
> private String createRule1() {
> StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
> sb.append("package alarms; \n");
> sb.append("import java.util.ArrayList; \n");
> sb.append("import TestAddPkg; \n");
> sb.append("import TestAddPkg.Alarm; \n");
> sb.append("rule lowLvlAlarm \n");
> sb.append("when \n");
> sb.append(" $a : ArrayList(size > 0) from collect (Alarm( level == \"low\")) \n");
> sb.append("then \n");
> sb.append(" // quietlyInvestigateLowLvlAlarms(); \n");
> sb.append(" System.out.println(\"All is good.\"); \n");
> sb.append("end \n");
> return sb.toString();
> }
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-jira
mailing list