[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] (JASSIST-153) Support java7

[Shigeru Chiba (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Shigeru Chiba resolved JASSIST-153.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Duplicate Issue


See JASSIST-155 for a bug of Javassist.

If PowerMock directly uses javassist.bytecode.* classes, it must be also updated so that a stack map table will be
updated.
                
> Support java7
> -------------
>
>                 Key: JASSIST-153
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JASSIST-153
>             Project: Javassist
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.15.0-GA
>         Environment: Java 7u2
>            Reporter: Paul Lorenz
>            Assignee: Shigeru Chiba
>
> Javassist causes java.lang.VerifyError
> java.lang.VerifyError: Bad type on operand stack in method com.xXXX.XXXXX.XXXXX.XXXXXXX(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; at offset 182 at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2442) at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:2685) at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1620) at org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.<init>(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:55) at org.easymock.internal.MocksControl.createMock(MocksControl.java:59) at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.doCreateMock(PowerMock.java:2212) at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.doMock(PowerMock.java:2163) at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.mockStatic(PowerMock.java:287) at com.xactnet.credentials.ServiceAreaTest.testSetContractorId(ServiceAreaTest.java:61) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:312) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:296) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:112) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:73) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:284) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:209) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:148) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:122) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:120) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:102) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:53) at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run (PowerMockRunner.java:42)
> See: http://code.google.com/p/powermock/issues/detail?id=355

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira