[jboss-remoting-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBREM-1015) CLONE [JBREM-1014] - Support injection of socket factory class name into AbstractInvoker

[Ron Sigal (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12423293#action_12423293 ] 

Ron Sigal commented on JBREM-1015:
----------------------------------

Applied changes from JBREM-1014 to 2.x branch.

Waiting for results in hudson.

> CLONE [JBREM-1014] - Support injection of socket factory class name into AbstractInvoker
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JBREM-1015
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1015
>             Project: JBoss Remoting
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0.GA (Pinto)
>            Reporter: Ron Sigal
>            Assignee: Ron Sigal
>             Fix For: 2.4.0.SP1
>
>
> It is intended that org.jboss.remoting.AbstractInvoker can accept the class name of a SocketFactory, using the parameter org.jboss.remoting.Remoting.SOCKET_FACTORY_NAME (actual value "socketFactory").  Unfortunately, the parameter name "socketFactory" conflicts with the bean property of the same name.  In particular, the problem is that the method
>       public void setSocketFactory(SocketFactory socketFactory)
> in AbstractInvoker expects a SocketFactory instead of a String.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira