[jboss-remoting-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBREM-918) Make "remote:" resilient against connection failure
David Lloyd (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Mar 1 09:44:10 EST 2010
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12517290#action_12517290 ]
David Lloyd commented on JBREM-918:
-----------------------------------
The problem is that then when a connection is broken, all state must be maintained for some predetermined amount of time. This is a substantial amount of state - it can encompass any number of clients and streams and even in-flight requests and replies which may have been partially sent.
Perhaps this ties into graceful shutdown - if a connection is gracefully shutdown, then all clients and connections are closed, otherwise the information is all kept?
> Make "remote:" resilient against connection failure
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBREM-918
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-918
> Project: JBoss Remoting
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: r3 core: remote
> Reporter: David Lloyd
> Fix For: 3.1.0.Beta1
>
>
> If a remote connection is dropped, it should be possible to re-establish the connection and resume the session, without the loss of any in-flight requests/contexts/services/etc. As a corollary, it might be worth exploring having more than one connection in a "bundle" to help parallelize the transit load and avoid head-of-line bottleneck problems. Perhaps it is worth looking into multihoming as well.
> SSL contexts might be useful here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the jboss-remoting-issues
mailing list