From mgoldman at redhat.com Thu May 26 09:48:58 2016 From: mgoldman at redhat.com (Marek Goldmann) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:48:58 +0200 Subject: [jboss-rpm] RPM EPEL COPR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey Ben, The reason is fairly simple: it's too much work to make it happen. But that's not everything - someone needs to maintain it afterwards. We're talking here about adding about 150 new packages to EPEL. Even in Fedora there is no latest WildFly release because of this problem. With each upstream release there is a need to update about 50 packages, fix all incompatibility issues and so on. This is a full time job for at least one person. Only Gil (CCed) is working on updating packages in Fedora to ship newest WildFly in his spare time. There is interest to make it happen, but we need actions and people doing the actual job. I'm not able to lead it anymore. --Marek On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Hello Marek, > > I have tried contacting you before about wildfly in EPEL and COPR. I am also CC:ing to this apparently abandoned list, but you never know. > I am really having a hard time finding information about what stand in the way of a wildfly package entering EPEL and upgrading to 10. > Is it simply that this is overwhelmed for you, as the main packager, and if so would you need help? Or is this a decision from further up in the Fedora project? > > Regards, > > Benjamin Lefoul From benjamin.lefoul at nwise.se Thu May 26 10:14:16 2016 From: benjamin.lefoul at nwise.se (Benjamin Lefoul) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:14:16 +0000 Subject: [jboss-rpm] RPM EPEL COPR In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Thanks very much for your time. /Benjamin ________________________________________ From: gil Sent: 26 May 2016 16:09 To: Marek Goldmann; Benjamin Lefoul Cc: jboss-rpm at lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: RPM EPEL COPR Hi for now the status is this: at the moment are needed new 2 [1] packages for import wildfly-core [2] (spec file is almost ready[3]) [1] wildfly-build-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328065 wildfly-elytron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328064 see spec file for see the packages which should be updated. exception for wildfly-common and metainf-services [2] https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core [3] compatibility problems with our log4j libraries (use both 1.2.X and 2.X) regards .g Il 26/05/2016 15:48, Marek Goldmann ha scritto: > Hey Ben, > > The reason is fairly simple: it's too much work to make it happen. But > that's not everything - someone needs to maintain it afterwards. > > We're talking here about adding about 150 new packages to EPEL. Even > in Fedora there is no latest WildFly release because of this problem. > With each upstream release there is a need to update about 50 > packages, fix all incompatibility issues and so on. This is a full > time job for at least one person. Only Gil (CCed) is working on > updating packages in Fedora to ship newest WildFly in his spare time. > There is interest to make it happen, but we need actions and people > doing the actual job. I'm not able to lead it anymore. > > --Marek > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Benjamin Lefoul > wrote: >> Hello Marek, >> >> I have tried contacting you before about wildfly in EPEL and COPR. I am also CC:ing to this apparently abandoned list, but you never know. >> I am really having a hard time finding information about what stand in the way of a wildfly package entering EPEL and upgrading to 10. >> Is it simply that this is overwhelmed for you, as the main packager, and if so would you need help? Or is this a decision from further up in the Fedora project? >> >> Regards, >> >> Benjamin Lefoul From karm at redhat.com Mon May 30 10:17:08 2016 From: karm at redhat.com (Michal Karm Babacek) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:17:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [jboss-rpm] RPM EPEL COPR /pitching in/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1612079098.52977.1464617828981.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> If there is any new JBoss RPM movement arising from the ashes in Fedora, I could resurrect the late initiative on updating mod_cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247243 Sincerely yours mod_cluster upstream ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benjamin Lefoul" > To: "gil" , "Marek Goldmann" > Cc: jboss-rpm at lists.jboss.org > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 4:14:16 PM > Subject: Re: [jboss-rpm] RPM EPEL COPR > > Thanks very much for your time. /Benjamin > > ________________________________________ > From: gil > Sent: 26 May 2016 16:09 > To: Marek Goldmann; Benjamin Lefoul > Cc: jboss-rpm at lists.jboss.org > Subject: Re: RPM EPEL COPR > > Hi > > for now the status is this: > > at the moment are needed new 2 [1] packages for import wildfly-core [2] > (spec file is almost ready[3]) > > [1] > wildfly-build-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328065 > wildfly-elytron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328064 > see spec file for see the packages which should be updated. > exception for wildfly-common and metainf-services > > [2] https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core > [3] compatibility problems with our log4j libraries (use both 1.2.X and 2.X) > regards > .g > > Il 26/05/2016 15:48, Marek Goldmann ha scritto: > > Hey Ben, > > > > The reason is fairly simple: it's too much work to make it happen. But > > that's not everything - someone needs to maintain it afterwards. > > > > We're talking here about adding about 150 new packages to EPEL. Even > > in Fedora there is no latest WildFly release because of this problem. > > With each upstream release there is a need to update about 50 > > packages, fix all incompatibility issues and so on. This is a full > > time job for at least one person. Only Gil (CCed) is working on > > updating packages in Fedora to ship newest WildFly in his spare time. > > There is interest to make it happen, but we need actions and people > > doing the actual job. I'm not able to lead it anymore. > > > > --Marek > > > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Benjamin Lefoul > > wrote: > >> Hello Marek, > >> > >> I have tried contacting you before about wildfly in EPEL and COPR. I am > >> also CC:ing to this apparently abandoned list, but you never know. > >> I am really having a hard time finding information about what stand in the > >> way of a wildfly package entering EPEL and upgrading to 10. > >> Is it simply that this is overwhelmed for you, as the main packager, and > >> if so would you need help? Or is this a decision from further up in the > >> Fedora project? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Benjamin Lefoul > > > _______________________________________________ > jboss-rpm mailing list > jboss-rpm at lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-rpm > -- Sent from my Hosaka Ono-Sendai Cyberspace 7 -- Michal Karm Babacek ? JBoss QE Red Hat Czech | GMT+2 ? +420 737 778 560 (cell) ? +420 532 294 547 (?forwarded?) freenode: #wildfly #mod_cluster #fedora-devel ? http://modcluster.io ? karm at redhat.com