[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - probleam in granularity of interception

[fabiocsilva]

I am needing to intercept the call of a constructor in my application. 	
When the instantiation occurs within of a method called for the system executes correctly. However, the instantiation occurs, in fact, inside of a constructor of another object. This another object is singleton. In this case the pointcut is not running. What it can be?  

  | 
  | Running:
  | 
  | public class ServletInit extends HttpServlet {
  | 
  |    public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
  |     	EmployeeRecord er = new EmployeeRecord(null);
  |         ...
  |     }
  | }
  | 
  | 



  | ERROR:
  | 
  | 
  | public class ServletInit extends HttpServlet {
  | 
  |    public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
  |     	HealthWatcherFacade.getInstance();
  |         ...
  |     }
  | }
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | public class HealthWatcherFacade {
  | 	private static HealthWatcherFacade singleton; //padrao singleton
  | 	private ComplaintRecord complaintRecord;
  | 	private HealthUnitRecord healthUnitRecord;
  | 	private MedicalSpecialtyRecord specialtyRecord;
  | 	private DiseaseRecord diseaseRecord;		
  | 	private EmployeeRecord employeeRecord;
  | 
  | 	private HealthWatcherFacade() {		
  | 		complaintRecord = new ComplaintRecord(null);
  | 		healthUnitRecord = new HealthUnitRecord(null);
  | 		specialtyRecord = new MedicalSpecialtyRecord(null);
  | 		diseaseRecord = new DiseaseRecord(null);		
  | 		employeeRecord = new EmployeeRecord(null);
  | 	}
  | 	public synchronized static HealthWatcherFacade getInstance() {		
  | 		if (singleton == null) {
  | 			singleton = new HealthWatcherFacade();
  | 		}
  | 
  | 		return singleton;
  | 	}
  | ...
  | }
  | 
  | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3992132#3992132

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3992132