[jboss-user] [JBoss and NetBeans] - Re: NameNotFoundException: DefaultDS not bound - Entity Unit

[htran_888]

Hi L,

Thanks for your suggestion and I will try to modify these EJB 2.1 syntax for my EJB 3.0 issue. However, I have the following questions:
( i ) The code used was the same one that I have successfully compiled using the build.xml supplied as part of the EJB 3.0 Workbook (Bill Burke) on the command prompt. This means that it should not need further tampering/customisation to make it work. The only difference in this case is that I have used Netbeans to create this EJB that appears to have difficulty deploying properly. Received the following message when deploying the titan EJB using Netbeans to JBoss:

   06:16:28,187 INFO  [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/jmx-console, warUrl=.../deploy/jmx-console.war/
06:16:29,250 ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] Incomplete Deployment listing:

--- Incompletely deployed packages ---
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentInfo at 62fe5342 { url=file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA/server/default/deploy/titan.jar }
  deployer: MBeanProxyExt[jboss.ejb3:service=EJB3Deployer]
  status: Deployment FAILED reason: Trying to install an already registered mbean: jboss.system:service=ThreadPool
  state: FAILED
  watch: file:/C:/jboss-4.0.4.GA/server/default/deploy/titan.jar
  altDD: null
  lastDeployed: 1170962187656
  lastModified: 1170962187312
  mbeans:

No Cabin table has been created either.
( ii ) Could anyone assist me in translating those EJB 2.1 statements to EJB 3.0 since I am very new to EJB 3.0 and does not have a clue how EJB 2.1 work.

I will read up some Netbeans user guide/cheat sheet to ensure that the titan EJB is created properly, even though it is a very straight forward step.

Lastly, is it possible that I could not have both Glassfish (ASJS 9.0) & JBoss AS 4.0.4 co-existing on the same Windows XP platform?

I do appreciate very much for you helping me out on this issue.

Thanks,

Henry

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013237#4013237

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013237