[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Entry Point

[David Radunz]

Hi,

    Should the same technique be used to layer xhtml resources like 
EJB's can be (using the @Install annotation)? If so, how would you have 
multiple pages.xml files - and would it conflict?

Say I had a real view: "/product/function.xhtml" and I had customised 
version of it deployed at a particular site called 
"/site/product/function.xhtml". Could (or rather should) I use this 
approach:

<page view-id="/product/function.xhtml">
	<navigation>
		<render view-id="/site/product/function.xhtml"/>
	</navigation>
</page>


And refer to the view generally as only "/product/function.xhtml", but 
actually load "/site/product/function.xhtml". Or should I use something 
like EL at all times and resolve the actual resource via a method call 
or resource bundle?

What methodology have you used to address this in the past?

Cheers,

David



gavin.king at jboss.com wrote:

>pages.xml for a fake view id is like:
>
><page view-id="/entryPoint.xhtml">
>  |     <action execute="#{something.doSomething}"/>
>  |     <navigation>
>  |         <render view-id="/displayWelcome.xhtml"/>
>  |     </navigation>
>  | </page>
>
>or something close to that.
>
>There is no /entryPoint.xhtml file. thats just the URL you want to appear in the browser.
>
>View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4057064#4057064
>
>Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4057064
>_______________________________________________
>jboss-user mailing list
>jboss-user at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
>
>-----------------
>Utiba Pty Ltd 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
>believed to be clean.
>
>  
>