[jboss-user] [Microcontainer] - Re: StructureDeployer that supports subdeployments

[alesj]

"beve" wrote : 
  | Regarding the solution with a StructureProcessor and the example you gave , SeamTempModificationTypeMatcher. Could you explain a little more how this could be used to solve the issue with subdirectory deployments?
  | 
You would write your own EsbModificationTypeMatcher.
Where ModificationTypeStructureProcessor picks up this EMTM by MC's incallback.

e.g.

  | public class EsbModificationTypeMatcher implements ModificationTypeMatcher
  | {
  |    private StructureDeployer warStructureDeployer = null; // get it injected
  |    private VFSStructuralDeployers deployers = null; // get it injected
  | 
  |    public boolean determineModification(VirtualFile root, StructureMetaData structureMetaData)
  |    {
  |       try
  |       {
  |          if (root.getName().endsWith(".esb"))
  |          {
  |             VirtualFile wars = root.getChild("wars");
  |             if (wars != null)
  |             {
  |                List<VirtualFile> children = wars.getChildren();
  |                for (VirtualFile war : children)
  |                {
  |                   StructureContext context = new StructureContext(root, root, war, structureMetaData, deployers, null);
  |                   warStructureDeployer.determineStructure(context);
  |                }
  |             }
  |             return true;
  |          }
  |       }
  |       catch (Exception ignored)
  |       {
  |       }
  |       return false;
  |    }
  | 
  |    public boolean determineModification(VirtualFile root, ContextInfo contextInfo)
  |    {
  |       // cannot change sub-deployment
  |       return false;
  |    }
  | }
  | 

Perhaps try something like this.
If this doesn't work, I would fallback to writing my own StructureDeployer.
Where you can extend JARStructure (to only understand .esb) + change its candidateStructureVisitorFactory.

View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247569#4247569

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247569