[jboss-user] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration
Flavia Rainone
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Jun 3 11:32:05 EDT 2010
Flavia Rainone [http://community.jboss.org/people/flavia.rainone%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion
"Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/546078#546078
--------------------------------------------------------------
> Ales Justin wrote:
>
> Why the rush? :-)
> If you ask me, I would do it lazily aka on_demand.
>
> Scanning the whole common/lib is gonna be slow,
> and imo, people should not be using libs to deploy Weld components -- simply put them in deploy/.
>
> Or why would you do it upfront?
I've been thinking about correctness all this time. If somebody places a jar in lib and expects that the beans are created upfront when AS starts, then this would not work using your approach.
Thinking about performance, though, I think that we should trade that by better performance, i.e., we should use the suggested lazy approach.
And I don't see any useful scenario where somebody would want to have a bean deployed to lib dir loaded at startup, specially if no other bean deployed in deploy dir has a dependency towards it.
Pete, does the lazy approach fullfills the Weld prerequisites regarding lib jars?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/546078#546078]
Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2116]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20100603/51c69b43/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list