[jboss-user] [JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server] - Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration

Flavia Rainone do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Jun 3 11:32:05 EDT 2010


Flavia Rainone [http://community.jboss.org/people/flavia.rainone%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion

"Implementing a non-flat deployment for Weld Integration"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/546078#546078

--------------------------------------------------------------
> Ales Justin wrote:
> 
> Why the rush? :-)
> If you ask me, I would do it lazily aka on_demand.
> 
> Scanning the whole common/lib is gonna be slow,
> and imo, people should not be using libs to deploy Weld components -- simply put them in deploy/.
> 
> Or why would you do it upfront?
I've been thinking about correctness all this time. If somebody places a jar in lib and expects that the beans are created upfront when AS starts, then this would not work using your approach.

Thinking about performance, though, I think that we should trade that by better performance, i.e., we should use the suggested lazy approach.

And I don't see any useful scenario where somebody would want to have a bean deployed to lib dir loaded at startup, specially if no other bean deployed in deploy dir has a dependency towards it.

Pete, does the lazy approach fullfills the Weld prerequisites regarding lib jars?

--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/546078#546078]

Start a new discussion in JBoss Microcontainer Development POJO Server at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2116]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20100603/51c69b43/attachment.html 


More information about the jboss-user mailing list