[jboss-user] [JBoss Remoting Development] New message: "Re: Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?"

[Ron Sigal]

User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?":

http://community.jboss.org/message/532302#532302

Author  : Ron Sigal
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ron.sigal@jboss.com

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
No objections.
 
So, service type and group (instance) name are analogous to interface and implementation, I guess, so the name could be derived from that analogy, as well.  But "instanceName" seems OK, too.
 
-Ron

--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/532302#532302