<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    I made the following updates to
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts">https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts</a>:<br>
    <ul>
      <li>Created the 6.4.x-develop branch based on the current
        6.3.x-develop branch and made it the default branch.</li>
      <li>Removed the following branches:</li>
      <ul>
        <li>6.2.x-develop </li>
        <li>6.3.x-develop </li>
        <li>jdf-2.1.9.Final</li>
      </ul>
      <li>Tagged the 6.3.x branch with the 6.3.0.GA tag. Rafael
        suggested this should be done using dist/release.sh to update
        the versions, create the tag and remove template folder. We will
        check with Paul Gier when he gets back to do this property.<br>
      </li>
    </ul>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/15/2014 09:01 AM, Rafael
      Benevides wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:53EE04BE.1080504@redhat.com" type="cite">Ref
      to the branches, I also think that we should do a cleanup removing
      <br>
      <br>
      - 6.2.x-develop
      <br>
      - 6.3.x-develop
      <br>
      - jdf-2.1.9.Final
      <br>
      <br>
      branches (keeping the tags)
      <br>
      <br>
      Btw,
      <br>
      <br>
      There's also a kitchensink-angularjs and wildfly branches that
      were not updated since last year.
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Anyone has any objections on removing theses branches ?
      <br>
      <br>
      Em 8/14/14, 16:04, Sande Gilda escreveu:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">Rafael, that sounds great to me.
        <br>
        <br>
        Paul, does this work for you?
        <br>
        <br>
        On 08/14/2014 02:26 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
        <br>
        <blockquote type="cite">I think we should tag the 6.3
          quickstarts, then keep the same 6.3.x for EAP 6.3.1 and rename
          the 6.3.x-develop to 6.4.x-develop
          <br>
          <br>
          6.3.x-develop -&gt; rename to 6.4.x-develop
          <br>
          6.3.x -&gt; keep it to EAP 6.3.1
          <br>
          <br>
          That's what I think about it.
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Em 8/14/14, 14:33, Sande Gilda escreveu:
          <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">Now that JBoss EAP 6.3 is GA, do we
            need to tag the quickstarts and create new branches for EAP
            6.3.1 and EAP 6.4? It's so seldom we do this that I forget!
            <br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>