<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Em 9/5/14, 8:47, Max Rydahl Andersen
escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">so a few things:
<br>
<br>
in stacks.yml the id is 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' and in
this patch it is 'jboss-products-ga-repo' but it is still using
the techpreview url (/techpreview/all).
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Since the Archtypes were released, should I update the Stacks to `
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta charset="utf-8">
jboss-product-repository` for those archtypes only ? Then I update
the patch for 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' for the next EAP
6.4 release ?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">I can also see that earlyaccess is now enabled by
default on <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/commit/35847933994901f2ff29e0de20de1845f7972708">https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/commit/35847933994901f2ff29e0de20de1845f7972708</a>
is that expected ?
<br>
</blockquote>
I don't know.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<br>
Anyways:
<br>
<br>
1) can we agree on aligning the id's ? (just so we are in sync)
<br>
</blockquote>
Yeap. For sure! I'll update the patch file now for
<meta charset="utf-8">
to 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' as I just said..<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<br>
2) is it expected the id says 'ga' but the url is not that ?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Once that we change to '
<meta charset="utf-8">
redhat-techpreview-all-repository' it won't matter anymore.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<br>
For #1 we should look at updating that in stacks.yml so we add it
with the same id.
<br>
<br>
Before changing stacks.yml I want to be sure #2 was consistent
choice we wanted to make for that?
<br>
<br>
ps. we actually also add this repo as a plugin repository - not
sure if that matters for you?
<br>
</blockquote>
I don't think it matters since the tests worked fine.<br>
<br>
So that's my plan:<br>
<br>
1 - Update the patch file to use 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository'
as repo id instead of 'jboss-products-ga-repo'. It will be available
for next EAP 6.4 Archtype release.<br>
<br>
2 - Wait for your answer if we should update stacks.yaml repo to '
<meta charset="utf-8">
jboss-products-ga-repo' for EAP 6.3 Archetypes only <br>
<br>
Is that right ?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D2D53978-355C-4F16-B73A-87FF211028E9@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<br>
/max
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>