[jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:56:04 +0100, Rob Stryker <rstryker at redhat.com>  
wrote:

> archive is fine, but i see this as low priority for the upcoming  
> release. Fixing bugs is much more important right now than naming.

Sure lets not delay the release further - bugfixes is priority 1; but its  
important one usability wise
and I guess the API should also be changed or ?

/max

>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen"  
> <max.andersen at redhat.com>
> To: <jbosside-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:30 AM
> Subject: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is  
> ambigious/confusing
>
>
>>
>> I created this isssue a couple of days ago:  
>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448
>>
>> I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too  
>> ambigious to use
>> as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces.
>>
>> Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague  
>> confuses more than
>> it explains...and that is not good.
>>
>> My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the  
>> Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder.
>>
>> -- --
>> Max Rydahl Andersen
>> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>>
>> Hibernate
>> max at hibernate.org
>> http://hibernate.org
>>
>> JBoss a division of Red Hat
>> max.andersen at jboss.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosside-dev mailing list
>> jbosside-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
>>
>



-- 
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
max at hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org

JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen at jboss.com