[jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2

[Igor Shabalov]

What the exception?

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Alexey Kazakov wrote:
>> Hello Gurkan,
>>
>> If we use RHDS JSF Project Wizard and RHDS JSF 1.1 Templates with 
>> JBoss 4.2 Runtime
>> then we add:
>>  <context-param>
>>   <param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name>
>>   <param-value>true</param-value>
>>  </context-param>
>> into Web.xml
>> It allows us to run JSF project with bundled implementation.
>> In this case we can deploy and run JSF 1.1 project via RHDS.
>> I see some exceptions in JBoss console but it seams project works.
>
> there shouldn't be exceptions ... ;(
>
> m/ax
>
>>
>>
>> Monday, July 16, 2007, 2:29:56 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> In WTP JSF project, you can create JSF library with wizard, then
>>> add jsf-runtime you wish and use it. But it also provides
>>> default runtime, while creating the Dynamic Web Project with JSF facet.
>>
>>> Maybe exadel could do this;
>>
>>> Gurkan
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen at redhat.com>
>>> To: Igor Shabalov <ishabalov at exadel.com>
>>> Cc: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:21:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2
>>
>>> Igor Shabalov wrote:
>>>> 4.2.0 have JSF 1.2 under the hood by default. It is not expected to 
>>>> be compatible with any JSF 1.1 templates.
>>>>
>>>> We need some way to prevent deploying incompatible projects. I'd 
>>>> love to throw JSF 1.1 away completely, but I suspect
>>>> that users of 4.0.5 will not appreciate such radical solution.
>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>
>>> Isn't that was project facets are for in WTP ?
>>
>>> There the runtime tells you what it can actually support.
>>
>>> /max
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: jbosstools-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org 
>>>> [mailto:jbosstools-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Marshall
>>>> Culpepper
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 3:22 PM
>>>> To: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2
>>>>
>>>> Hey guys..
>>>>
>>>> I've been running through a demo I'm going to give tonight at a 
>>>> local JBoss User Group meeting, and I noticed some strange behavior 
>>>> with our JBoss 4.2.0.GA and using the "JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl" 
>>>> configuration from the new JSF project wizard.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, whenever the jsf project is deployed to my clean copy of 
>>>> JBoss 4.2.0 , lots of exceptions show up (though the application 
>>>> itself seems to work fine). When I start changing things from their 
>>>> default configuration (I'm using the kickstart as a quick startup 
>>>> for the demo), JBoss consistently throws exceptions until I hard 
>>>> undeploy/deploy the app from the App Server.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, if I select a "JSF 1.2" configuration in the 
>>>> wizard, the project deploys/redeploys with no errors, and seems to 
>>>> work without a hitch with any changes I make. I guess what I'm 
>>>> getting at is -- if we're going to use JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference 
>>>> Implementation as the "default" selection in the new JSF project 
>>>> wizard, shouldn't we be testing it's "noiseyness factor"?. Would it 
>>>> be a problem to have JSF 1.2 selected as default (or maybe another 
>>>> configuration that JBoss 4.2.0.GA likes?)
>>>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>      
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________ 
>>>
>>> Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel
>>> today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>
>