[jbosstools-dev] Release Process

[Marshall Culpepper]

We still need to keep the EJB3 Classpath Container for potential POJPs.. 
getting rid of everything else is A-OK with me though..

Rob Stryker wrote:
> I'm inclined to believe we should just get rid of our ejb3 
> implementation. It serves no purpose now and keeping it around can 
> only confuse users.
>
> It's purpose was to provide an ejb3-light facet, which could then be 
> combined with the dynamic web facet to make a seam project.
>
> We already have a seam project. And a seam facet. Neither of which 
> uses the ejb3 facet from what I can tell. Therefore the jboss ejb3 
> project, and its facet, has become useless.


-- 
Marshall Culpepper
Redhat Dev Studio, JBoss Tools
-
http://jboss.org/tools
email: marshall at jboss.org
skype: marshall.culpepper