[jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:13:48 +0100, Daniel Azarov <daniel at exadel.com> wrote:

> Total file list:
>
> wtp-usage.xml
> wtp-usage.html
> api-ref-compatibility.html
> api-ref-compatibility.xml

ok - attach them all to the issue.

/max

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>
> To: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>; "Daniel Azarov"
> <daniel at exadel.com>; "Denis Golovin" <dgolovin at exadel.com>
> Cc: <jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>; <external-exadel-list at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings
>
>
> btw. what are the other files you say is generated ?
>
> /max
>
>>> API ScanningsI tried to make a report with JBDS GA and WTP 2.0.1 (see
> attachment)
>>> I can send all API scanner output files if anybody need it.
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>> I guess we need both the usage report and the report that checks for API
> and non-API breakages.
>>
>> I created http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBDS-242, please attach the
> generated files to there and i'll
>> pass it along to our WTP contacts.
>>
>> Thanks Daniel!
>> /max
>>
>>
>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>   From: Denis Golovin
>>>   To: Max Rydahl Andersen
>>>   Cc: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org ; external-exadel-list at redhat.com
>>>   Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:58 PM
>>>   Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings
>>>
>>>
>>>   Alex Kazakov
>>>
>>>   can do it next week.
>>>
>>>   Denis
>>>
>>>   Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> I always forget this, but we should really get around sending them our
> adopter report...
>>>
>>> Anyone up for doing that ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> ------- Forwarded message -------
>>> From: "Raev, Kaloyan" <kaloyan.raev at sap.com>
>>> To: "Webtools releng discussion list" <wtp-releng at eclipse.org>, "General
> discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev at eclipse.org>
>>> Cc:
>>> Subject: [wtp-dev] API Scannings
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:52:17 +0100
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have resurrected the API scanning procedure. Almost all of the API
>>> scanning steps run properly. I have still some troubles with the code
>>> coverage part.
>>>
>>> I'd like to catch your attention on the Adopter Breakage Report.
>>>
>>> I have genereated reports for:
>>>  - R2.0.1:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0.1-2007092604
>>> 2742/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>>  - last M2.0.2 I-build:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.2-2007122206
>>> 0852/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>>  - 3.0 M4:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-2008010509
>>> 1323/
>>>
>>> Compared to the report for R2.0 there are lot of new adopter breakages:
>>>
> http://archive.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/
>>> apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>> I would like also to request adopters, who have already adopted the WTP
>>> 2.0.1 release, to provide updated adopter scanner reports for their
> product
>>> based on WTP 2.0.1. This way we can see the real delta between their last
>>> adoption and the current development. How to create the report is
> described
>>> here:
>>> http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/tool.html
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> Kaloyan Raev
>>> Eclipse WTP Committer
>>> <http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/people/person.php?name=raev>
>>> Senior Developer
>>> NW C JS TOOLS JEE (BG)
>>> SAP Labs Bulgaria
>>> T +359/2/9157-416
>>> mailto:kaloyan.raev at sap.com
>>> www.sap.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>>>
>>>
>>>     Hello,
>>>
>>>     I have resurrected the API scanning procedure. Almost all of the API
> scanning steps run properly. I have still some troubles with the code
> coverage part.
>>>
>>>     I'd like to catch your attention on the Adopter Breakage Report.
>>>
>>>     I have genereated reports for:
>>>       - R2.0.1:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0.1-20070926042742/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>>       - last M2.0.2 I-build:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.2-20071222060852/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>>       - 3.0 M4:
>>>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-20080105091323/
>>>
>>>     Compared to the report for R2.0 there are lot of new adopter
> breakages:
>>>
> http://archive.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>>
>>>     I would like also to request adopters, who have already adopted the
> WTP 2.0.1 release, to provide updated adopter scanner reports for their
> product based on WTP 2.0.1. This way we can see the real delta between their
> last adoption and the current development. How to create the report is
> described here:
>>>
>>>     http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/tool.html
>>>
>>>     Greetings,
>>>     Kaloyan Raev
>>>     Eclipse WTP Committer
>>>     Senior Developer
>>>     NW C JS TOOLS JEE (BG)
>>>     SAP Labs Bulgaria
>>>     T +359/2/9157-416
>>>     mailto:kaloyan.raev at sap.com
>>>     www.sap.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>>>
>>>
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>   jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>   jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>   https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/